4.6 Article

Data-Driven Mathematical Model of Osteosarcoma

期刊

CANCERS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102367

关键词

osteosarcoma; data-driven mathematical model; immune variations; sensitivity analysis; gene expression profiles; tumor deconvolution; immune interactions; tumor microenvironment

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R21CA242933]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a data-driven mathematical model to study the interactions between immune cells and the osteosarcoma microenvironment, finding that the relative abundance of different immune cell populations has varying effects on tumor growth.
As the immune system has a significant role in tumor progression, in this paper, we develop a data-driven mathematical model to study the interactions between immune cells and the osteosarcoma microenvironment. Osteosarcoma tumors are divided into three clusters based on their relative abundance of immune cells as estimated from their gene expression profiles. We then analyze the tumor progression and effects of the immune system on cancer growth in each cluster. Cluster 3, which had approximately the same number of naive and M2 macrophages, had the slowest tumor growth, and cluster 2, with the highest population of naive macrophages, had the highest cancer population at the steady states. We also found that the fastest growth of cancer occurred when the anti-tumor immune cells and cytokines, including dendritic cells, helper T cells, cytotoxic cells, and IFN-gamma, switched from increasing to decreasing, while the dynamics of regulatory T cells switched from decreasing to increasing. Importantly, the most impactful immune parameters on the number of cancer and total cells were the activation and decay rates of the macrophages and regulatory T cells for all clusters. This work presents the first osteosarcoma progression model, which can be later extended to investigate the effectiveness of various osteosarcoma treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据