4.7 Article

Chronic Inflammation Impairs Male Fertility-A Case-Control Study in Ulcerative Colitis Patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071460

关键词

inflammatory bowel disease; ulcerative colitis; semen analysis; antisperm antibodies; oxidation-reduction potential; male sex hormones; bacterial infection

资金

  1. Medical University of Lublin [DS 534]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent evidence suggests that inflammation may negatively impact male fertility. This study found that male patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) had significantly lower sperm quality parameters compared to healthy individuals, possibly due to intensified oxidative stress.
Recent evidence indicates that a systemic state of inflammation may exert a negative effect on male fertility. The aim of this study is to evaluate sperm quality parameters in male patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Between December 2019 and December 2020 semen analyses are performed in 50 patients with UC in clinical remission. The control group consists of 50 healthy volunteers. Total sperm count, sperm count, percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa, viability, and progressive motility, are significantly lower in the study group than in healthy males (p < 0.001). The DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) are significantly higher in the study group (28.9% and 1.55% on average, respectively) than in healthy males (14.6% and 0.79% on average, respectively). Bacteriospermia is more clearly observed in the study group (p = 0.037), and the most frequent pathogen is Enterococcus faecalis. The DFI and ORP are significantly higher in bacteria carriers, compared to males without microbial pathogens from both the study and control groups (p < 0.001). To conclude, UC patients have worse basic sperm parameters compared to their healthy counterparts. Deterioration of semen parameters, as well as an intensified DNA fragmentation could be a result of oxidative stress intensification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据