4.7 Review

Nailfold Capillaroscopy in Systemic Sclerosis Patients with and without Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071528

关键词

pulmonary arterial hypertension; systemic sclerosis; nailfold capillaroscopy; meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In patients with systemic sclerosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension is a leading cause of mortality. Analysis of nailfold capillaroscopy revealed reduced capillary density and increased capillary loop width in SSc-PAH patients compared to those without PAH. Additionally, SSc-PAH patients were more likely to exhibit an active or late scleroderma pattern.
Systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) is a leading cause of mortality in SSc. The extent of peripheral microvasculopathy assessed through nailfold capillaroscopy might correlate with the presence of PAH in SSc patients. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases and performed a random effects meta-analysis of observational studies comparing nailfold capillaroscopic alterations in SSc-PAH versus SSc-noPAH patients. Weighted mean differences (WMD) with the corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Seven studies with 101 SSc-PAH and 277 SSc-noPAH participants were included. Capillary density was marginally reduced in the SSc-PAH group (WMD: -1.0, 95% CI: -2.0 to 0.0, I-2 = 86%). This effect was strengthened once PAH diagnosis was confirmed by right heart catheterization (WMD: -1.2, 95% CI: -2.3 to -0.1, I-2 = 85%). An increase in capillary loop width was observed in SSc-PAH compared to SSc-noPAH patients (WMD: 10.9, 95% CI: 2.5 to 19.4, I-2 = 78%). Furthermore, SSc-PAH patients had a 7.3 times higher likelihood of active or late scleroderma pattern (95% CI: 3.0 to 18.0, I-2 = 4%). SSc-PAH patients presented with worse nailfold capillaroscopic findings compared to SSc-noPAH patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据