4.7 Review

Interplay between Heart Disease and Metabolic Steatosis: A Contemporary Perspective

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081569

关键词

non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; fatty liver; cardiovascular diseases; ischemic heart disease; atrial fibrillation; pathophysiology; metabolic syndrome; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease diagnosis; cardiovascular diseases prognosis; cardiovascular medications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The liver-heart axis is a field of growing interest due to increasing evidence of complex bidirectional interplay between the two organs. NAFLD has a significant association with a wide spectrum of structural and functional cardiac diseases, while the impact of cardiac disease on NAFLD is not well studied. Further investigation into the heart-liver relationship is warranted due to the global health and economic burden posed by both diseases.
The liver-heart axis is a growing field of interest owing to rising evidence of complex bidirectional interplay between the two organs. Recent data suggest non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has a significant, independent association with a wide spectrum of structural and functional cardiac diseases, and seems to worsen cardiovascular disease (CVD) prognosis. Conversely, the effect of cardiac disease on NAFLD is not well studied and data are mostly limited to cardiogenic liver disease. We believe it is important to further investigate the heart-liver relationship because of the tremendous global health and economic burden the two diseases pose, and the impact of such investigations on clinical decision making and management guidelines for both diseases. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on NAFLD diagnosis, its systemic manifestations, and associations with CVD. More specifically, we review the pathophysiological mechanisms that govern the interplay between NAFLD and CVD and evaluate the relationship between different CVD treatments and NAFLD progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据