4.8 Article

Room temperature coherent control of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf3630

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG through the Wurzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence on Complexity and Topology in Quantum Matter-ct.qmat [EXC 2147, 39085490, DY18/13-1]
  2. Alexander von Humboldt (AvH) Foundation
  3. Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development grant [FA2386-20-1-4014]
  4. Humboldt Foundation
  5. Australian Research Council [DP180100077, CE200100010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research team successfully realized coherent control of ensembles of boron vacancy centers in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) and measured the spin characteristics at different temperatures. They proposed a method to substantially reduce the magnetic resonance linewidth, providing important insights for the employment of van der Waals materials in quantum technologies.
Optically active spin defects are promising candidates for solid-state quantum information and sensing applications. To use these defects in quantum applications coherent manipulation of their spin state is required. Here, we realize coherent control of ensembles of boron vacancy centers in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN). Specifically, by applying pulsed spin resonance protocols, we measure a spin-lattice relaxation time of 18 microseconds and a spin coherence time of 2 microseconds at room temperature. The spin-lattice relaxation time increases by three orders of magnitude at cryogenic temperature. By applying a method to decouple the spin state from its inhomogeneous nuclear environment the optically detected magnetic resonance linewidth is substantially reduced to several tens of kilohertz. Our results are important for the employment of van der Waals materials for quantum technologies, specifically in the context of high resolution quantum sensing of two-dimensional heterostructures, nanoscale devices, and emerging atomically thin magnets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据