4.8 Article

Endothelial cyclooxygenase-1 paradoxically drives local vasoconstriction and atherogenesis despite underpinning prostacyclin generation

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf6054

关键词

-

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [FS/16/1/31699, RG/18/4/33541]
  2. NIH/National Cancer Institute [R01-CA084572, R01-CA123055, P50-CA086306]
  3. Phelps Family Foundation
  4. Crump Family Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The endothelial cyclooxygenase-1 produces both protective and pathological products, ultimately leading to pathological responses such as vasoconstriction in vitro and the development of atherosclerosis and vascular inflammation in vivo. This highlights the potential of the vascular cyclooxygenase-1 pathway as a therapeutic target and emphasizes that the role of prostanoids in biology is complex and context-dependent.
Endothelial cyclooxygenase-1-derived prostanoids, including prostacyclin, have clear cardioprotective roles associated with their anti-thrombotic potential but have also been suggested to have paradoxical pathological activities within arteries. To date it has not been possible to test the importance of this because no models have been available that separate vascular cyclooxygenase-1 products from those generated elsewhere. Here, we have used unique endothelial-specific cyclooxygenase-1 knockout mice to show that endothelial cyclooxygenase-1 produces both protective and pathological products. Functionally, however, the overall effect of these was to drive pathological responses in the context of both vasoconstriction in vitro and the development of atherosclerosis and vascular inflammation in vivo. These data provide the first demonstration of a pathological role for the vascular cyclooxygenase-1 pathway, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target. They also emphasize that, across biology, the role of prostanoids is not always predictable due to unique balances of context, products, and receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据