4.8 Article

Observation of cavitation governing fracture in glasses

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf7293

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB30000000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52001220, 51822107, 11790291, 61999102, 61888102]
  3. National Key Research and Development Plan [2018YFA0703603]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019B030302010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study provides experimental evidence that confirms the role of cavitation mechanism in glass fracture, revealing that self-organized nucleation, growth, and coalescence of nanocavities lead to the appearance of nanopatterns on fracture surfaces. This confirms the presence of nanoscale ductility in fracture of nominally brittle glasses.
Crack propagation is the major vehicle for material failure, but the mechanisms by which cracks propagate remain longstanding riddles, especially for glassy materials with a long-range disordered atomic structure. Recently, cavitation was proposed as an underlying mechanism governing the fracture of glasses, but experimental determination of the cavitation behavior of fracture is still lacking. Here, we present unambiguous experimental evidence to firmly establish the cavitation mechanism in the fracture of glasses. We show that crack propagation in various glasses is dominated by the self-organized nucleation, growth, and coalescence of nanocavities, eventually resulting in the nanopatterns on the fracture surfaces. The revealed cavitation-induced nanostructured fracture morphologies thus confirm the presence of nanoscale ductility in the fracture of nominally brittle glasses, which has been debated for decades. Our observations would aid a fundamental understanding of the failure of disordered systems and have implications for designing tougher glasses with excellent ductility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据