4.8 Article

Output planning at the input stage in visual working memory

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe8212

关键词

-

资金

  1. Clarendon Fund
  2. Mary Somerville Graduate School Scholarship
  3. Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award [104571/Z/14/Z]
  4. James S. McDonnell Foundation Understanding Human Cognition Collaborative Award [220020448]
  5. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship from the European Commission (ACCESS2WM)
  6. ERC Starting Grant from the European Research Council (MEMTICIPATION) [850636]
  7. NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre
  8. Wellcome Trust [203139/Z/16/Z]
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [850636] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prospective action plans are brought into working memory early, in tandem with sensory encoding, and precede a second stage of action preparation based on the time of expected memory utilization. This dual visual-motor memory code can make memories more effective and robust in serving ensuing behavior.
Working memory serves as the buffer between past sensations and future behavior, making it vital to understand not only how we encode and retain sensory information in memory but also how we plan for its upcoming use. We ask when prospective action goals emerge alongside the encoding and retention of visual information in working memory. We show that prospective action plans do not emerge gradually during memory delays but are brought into memory early, in tandem with sensory encoding. This action encoding (i) precedes a second stage of action preparation that adapts to the time of expected memory utilization, (ii) occurs even ahead of an intervening motor task, and (iii) predicts visual memory-guided behavior several seconds later. By bringing prospective action plans into working memory at an early stage, the brain creates a dual (visual-motor) memory code that can make memories more effective and robust for serving ensuing behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据