4.7 Article

Copolymers of diallyldimethylammonium chloride and 2-(diallyl(methyl) ammonio) acetate: Effect of composition and ionic strength on conformational properties

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 268-278

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.09.026

关键词

Zwitterionic copolymer; Conformational characteristics; Reduced viscosity; Polyelectrolyte; Carboxybetaine

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [16-33-60104 mol_a_dk]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copolymerization of diallyldimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC) with 2-(diallyl (methyl.) ammonio) acetate (DAMA) was studied. A homologous series of random copolymers (poly(DADMAC-co-DAMA)) with the DADMAC:DAMA ratio equal to 3:7 was investigated by dynamic and static light scattering, viscometry, and flow birefringence in 0.1 M NaOH solutions with the addition of NaCl (up to 1 M). The Mark-Kuhn-Houwink equations were obtained. It was established that decrease in the concentration of low molecular weight salt leads to sharp increase in thermodynamic quality of solvents, and, therefore, in swelling of the macromolecules. Equilibrium rigidity of the studied copolymer was determined as 5 nm. Conformational behavior of poly(DADMAC) (polyelectrolyte), poly(DAMA) (polyzwitterion) and poly(DADMAC-co-DAMA) with the DADMAC:DAMA ratio equal to 3:7 was investigated in solutions at different ionic strength values. It was established that at NaCl concentrations below 0.1 M, copolymer exhibits properties typical of polyelectrolyte, and at higher NaCl concentrations it exhibits properties typical of polyzwitterion. Detailed consideration of contributions of optical effects of micro- and macroform to the observed flow birefringence in copolymer solutions allowed us to estimate optical characteristics of copolymer macromolecules. It was established that in salt-free aqueous solution, poly(DADMAC-co-DAMA) macromolecular coils swell isotropically. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据