4.2 Article

Simultaneous determination of 13 mycotoxins in feedstuffs using QuEChERS extraction

期刊

APPLIED BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13765-021-00602-9

关键词

Mycotoxins; QuEChERS; LC-MS/MS; Feedstuffs; Fumonisines

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through Agro and Livestock Products Safety Flow Management Technology Development Program - Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) [31871-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the residual concentrations of mycotoxins in Korean feedstuffs did not exceed the maximum residue levels set by the Korean Food and Drug Administration, intensive management and regular monitoring are still necessary to ensure food safety.
Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by various fungi and are known to have a significant negative impact on human and animal health. When feedstuffs are contaminated with mycotoxins, their toxicities may be caused a variety of diseases. In this study, the residual mycotoxins in feedstuffs were analyzed using LC-MS/MS incorporated with QuEChERS extraction. Analytical method validation was performed for LOD, LOQ, linearity, and recoveries with consideration of matrix effects prior to the residual analysis. They were all reached to the accepted range of validation level. Using 39 feedstuff samples (5 g) for mycotoxin analysis, nine samples were contaminated by four major mycotoxins such as fumonisin B1 (FB1), deoxynivalenol, fumonisin B2, and zearalenone. Among them, FB1 was detected at the highest concentration as 18.0943 mg/kg. The total sum of fumonisins in 39 samples did not exceed the maximum residual level (MRL) criterion set by Korean Food and Drug Administration. Altogether, intensive management of mycotoxins in Korean feedstuffs should be implemented with proper and routine monitoring, even their residual concentrations are not exceeded over the MRL levels because of high frequent detection found in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据