4.6 Article

Operando Measurement of Layer Breathing Modes in Lithiated Graphite

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 1633-1638

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00494

关键词

-

资金

  1. ISCF Faraday Challenge project: Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Degradation Processes in EV Batteries
  2. Royal Academy of Engineering
  3. Thomas Young Centre [TYC-101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reports direct detection and dissociation of specific crystallographic phases in lithiated graphite, confirming the impact of local strain on the graphite lattice during lithium intercalation/deintercalation process. The findings reveal new graphene-like characteristics in lithiated graphite under deep charged condition due to the induced strain by inserted lithium. Additionally, the study provides a simple experimental tool to measure induced strain in the graphite structure under full intercalation conditions.
Despite their ubiquitous usage and increasing societal dependence on Li-ion batteries, there remains a lack of detailed empirical evidence of Li intercalation/deintercalation into graphite even though this process dictates the performance, longevity, and safety of the system. Here, we report direct detection and dissociation of specific crystallographic phases in the lithiated graphite, which form through a stepwise staging process. Using operando measurements, LiC18, LiC12, and LiC6 phases are observed via distinct low-frequency Raman features, which are the result of displacement of the graphite lattice by induced local strain. Density functional theory calculations confirm the nature of the Raman-active vibrational modes, to the layer breathing modes (LBMs) of the lithiated graphite. The new findings indicate graphene-like characteristics in the lithiated graphite under the deep charged condition due to the imposed strain by the inserted Li. Moreover, our approach also provides a simple experimental tool to measure induced strain in the graphite structure under full intercalation conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据