4.3 Article

The effects of nanosilver and nanoclay nanocomposites on shrimp (Penaeus semisulcatus) samples inoculated to food pathogens

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11694-021-00905-x

关键词

Nanoclay; Nanosilver; Antibacterial packaging; Vibrio parahaemolyticus; Prawn; Migration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the effects of nanoclay and nanosilver packaging on the growth of pathogens during the shelf life of shrimp. The results showed that nanopackaging significantly reduced colony counts and a synergistic effect was observed for packaging containing both nanoclay and nanosilver particles.
Today, antibacterial packaging plays a major role in enhancing shelf life of food products. Application of nanoclay and nanosilver as antimicrobial agents has been glorified recently in the food industry due to their ability to enhance mechanical properties of food packaging. As vibrio parahaemolyticus, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia Coli are among of the most usual bacteria affecting fisheries, the aim of this study was to evaluate effects of nanoclay and nanosilver packaging on the growth of pathogens within 6 days of shrimp shelf life at 4 degrees C. Silver and clay nanoparticles (NPs) were analyzed using AFM, SEM, FESEM, EDX, FTIR, DLS and TEM as well. The size of clay and silver nanoparticles were 15 nm and 35 nm respectively. 21 packaging samples containing 1 to 7 percent of NPs were produced using melt mixing method. Shrimps samples were inoculated with pathogens using a 0.5 McFarland standard and hot sealed using nanopackaging treatments. Result showed that nanopackaging could decrease colony counts more than one logarithmic cycle which was a significant reduction (P < 0.05). Also, a synergistic effect was observed for packaging containing both nanoclay and nanosilver particles. Results of the current study shows that application of silver and clay NPs in nanocomposites could be a promising method to reduce microbial load and increasing shelf life of perishable food products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据