4.5 Review

Survival and Complication of Liver Transplantation in Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.628771

关键词

liver transplant; infants; meta-analysis; survival; complication

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infant liver transplantation shows modest patient and graft survival rates, but with high rates of infection/sepsis-related complications. More comprehensive evidence is needed from studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up duration.
Background: Modern surgical techniques and scientific advancements have made liver transplant (LT) in infants feasible. However, there are only a small number of studies examining the short- as well as long-term outcomes of LT in this vulnerable subset of children. Methods: Comprehensive searches were done systematically through the PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar databases. Studies that were retrospective record based or adopted a cohort approach and reported either patient survival rates or graft survival rates or complications of LT in infants were included in the meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was done using STATA version 13.0. Results: A total of 22 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled patient survival rate at 1 year, >1-5 years, and >5 years post-transplantation was 85% (95% CI: 78--92%), 71% (95% CI: 59-83%), and 80% (95% CI: 69-91%), respectively. The overall pooled graft survival rate at 1 year, >1-5 years, and >5 years post-transplantation was 72% (95% CI: 68-76%), 62% (95% CI: 46-78%), and 71% (95% CI: 56-86%), respectively. The overall pooled rate for vascular complications, need for re-transplantation, biliary complications, and infection/sepsis was 12% (95% CI: 10-15%), 16% (95% CI: 12-20%), 15% (95% CI: 9-21%), and 50% (95% CI: 38-61%), respectively. Conclusion: The current meta-analysis showed modest patient and graft survival rates for infant liver transplantation. However, the complication rates related to infection/sepsis were high. More comprehensive evidence is required from studies with larger sample sizes and a longer duration of follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据