4.5 Article

Comparison of the influence of solid and phase change materials as a thermal storage medium on the performance of a solar chimney

期刊

ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 1274-1288

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ese3.892

关键词

computational fluid dynamics; heat storage; phase change; solar energy; wind

资金

  1. Qatar Foundation [210008390]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of heat storage system on power production of a solar chimney, evaluating different materials for energy storage. The top two solid and phase change material options are selected for simulation, demonstrating their potential in enhancing power output and efficiency.
This paper studies the heat storage system's influence on a solar chimney's power production. This study considers several material types, including solid and phase change materials, at the bottom section of a solar chimney for energy storage, and evaluates their effects on the energy yield and capacity to prolong the power output during the absence of the sun. A computational fluid dynamic model using COMSOL Multiphysics is performed to carry out this work. An initial steady-state analysis using average monthly irradiance is implemented, after which the top two solid and phase change material options are selected. Subsequently, a time-dependent simulation using a typical summer day is carried out for the chosen storage materials. The overall performance results are comparatively assessed in terms of average temperature, power generation, and efficiency. As a result, bismuth-led-tin-cadmium and magnesium chloride hexahydrate present the highest power production among the phase change materials, giving a yearly average power output of 27.46 kW and a storage temperature of about 346 K. On the other hand, sandstone offers the highest overall annual average power production, yielding 31.49 kW, and a storage temperature of 352.17 K. This material also reflects the highest yearly average energy and exergy efficiencies with 0.122% and 0.128%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据