4.6 Article

Optimization of Fabrication Process for SiON/SiOx Films Applicable as Optical Waveguides

期刊

COATINGS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings11050574

关键词

waveguide; AFM; SIMS; PECVD; silicon oxynitride

资金

  1. Science and Technology Assistance Agency [APVV-20-0437]
  2. grant agency of Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic [VEGA 1/0733/20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the analysis of SiON films deposited on silicon wafers for optical waveguides using the PECVD process, focusing on the impact of N2O flow rate. Various film properties were studied using different instruments, showing that increasing N2O flow rate led to a decrease in refractive index and an increase in deposition rate. By adjusting the gas flow rate during PECVD, the oxygen and nitrogen ratio in the SiON film could be controlled to tailor its optical properties for waveguide applications.
In this paper, the analysis of silicon oxynitride (SiON) films, deposited utilizing the plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) process, for optical waveguides on silicon wafers is presented. The impact of N2O flow rate on various SiON film properties was investigated. The thickness and refractive index were measured by micro-spot spectroscopic reflectometry and confirmed by spectroscopic ellipsometry. The chemical composition of SiON films was analyzed using Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS). The surface roughness was analyzed using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Increasing the N2O flow rate during deposition caused the deposition rate to increase and the refractive index to decrease. By changing the flow rate of gases into the chamber during the PECVD process, it is possible to precisely adjust the oxygen (O-2) ratio and nitrogen (N-2) ratio in the SiON film and thus control its optical properties. This was possibility utilized to fabricate SiON films suitable to serve as a waveguide core for optical waveguides with a low refractive index contrast.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据