4.6 Article

The impact of noise and topology on opinion dynamics in social networks

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201943

关键词

opinion dynamics; network science; social networks

资金

  1. EPSRC Early Career Fellowship in Digital Economy [EP/N006062/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/N006062/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of noise and topology on opinion diversity in social networks by extending well-established models of opinion dynamics to a stochastic setting. The general analytical expression derived from the model shows that opinion diversity decreases as communities and clusters are broken down. Testing predictions against empirical influence networks between major news outlets, incorporating the measure in linear models for sentiment expressed by sources yields a notable improvement in explanatory power.
We investigate the impact of noise and topology on opinion diversity in social networks. We do so by extending well-established models of opinion dynamics to a stochastic setting where agents are subject both to assimilative forces by their local social interactions, as well as to idiosyncratic factors preventing their population from reaching consensus. We model the latter to account for both scenarios where noise is entirely exogenous to peer influence and cases where it is instead endogenous, arising from the agents' desire to maintain some uniqueness in their opinions. We derive a general analytical expression for opinion diversity, which holds for any network and depends on the network's topology through its spectral properties alone. Using this expression, we find that opinion diversity decreases as communities and clusters are broken down. We test our predictions against data describing empirical influence networks between major news outlets and find that incorporating our measure in linear models for the sentiment expressed by such sources on a variety of topics yields a notable improvement in terms of explanatory power.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据