4.6 Article

Phosphate bound to calcareous sediments hampers skeletal development of juvenile coral

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201214

关键词

coral reefs; calcareous sediments; skeletal development; terrestrial runoff; phosphate contamination

资金

  1. Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan [JPMEERF20194007]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19K12310, 20H03077]
  3. Research Laboratory on Environmentally-conscious Developments and Technologies (E-code) at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H03077, 19K12310] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the significant role of calcareous sediments in coral reefs in mediating the impact of terrestrial runoff on corals by storing and releasing phosphate. High phosphate concentrations in seawater inhibit the skeletal formation of coral juveniles.
To test the hypothesis that terrestrial runoff affects the functions of calcareous sediments in coral reefs and hampers the development of corals, we analysed calcareous sediments with different levels of bound phosphate, collected from reef areas of Okinawajima, Japan. We confirmed that phosphate bound to calcareous sediments was readily released into ambient seawater, resulting in much higher concentrations of phosphorous in seawater from heavily polluted areas (4.3-19.0 mu M as compared with less than 0.096 mu M in natural ambient seawater). Additionally, we examined the effect of phosphate released from calcareous sediments on the development of Acropora digitifera coral juveniles. We found that high phosphate concentrations in seawater clearly inhibit the skeletal formation of coral juveniles. Our results demonstrate that calcareous sediments in reef areas play a crucial role in mediating the impact of terrestrial runoff on corals by storing and releasing phosphate in seawater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据