4.6 Article

Fine-scale changes in speed and altitude suggest protean movements in homing pigeon flights

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.210130

关键词

flight speed; predation risk; protean behaviour; flocking; landscape; pigeon

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union [715874]
  2. Max Planck Sabbatical Fellowship
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [715874] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that homing pigeons exhibit some energy-saving strategies in adjusting flight speed and power allocation, but choose higher speeds during descending flight. These subtle variations in speed and altitude may be a form of protean behavior adopted to reduce predation risk.
The power curve provides a basis for predicting adjustments that animals make in flight speed, for example in relation to wind, distance, habitat foraging quality and objective. However, relatively few studies have examined how animals respond to the landscape below them, which could affect speed and power allocation through modifications in climb rate and perceived predation risk. We equipped homing pigeons (Columba livia) with high-frequency loggers to examine how flight speed, and hence effort, varies in relation to topography and land cover. Pigeons showed mixed evidence for an energy-saving strategy, as they minimized climb rates by starting their ascent ahead of hills, but selected rapid speeds in their ascents. Birds did not modify their speed substantially in relation to land cover, but used higher speeds during descending flight, highlighting the importance of considering the rate of change in altitude before estimating power use from speed. Finally, we document an unexpected variability in speed and altitude over fine scales; a source of substantial energetic inefficiency. We suggest this may be a form of protean behaviour adopted to reduce predation risk when flocking is not an option, and that such a strategy could be widespread.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据