4.7 Article

Atmospherically Forced and Chaotic Interannual Variability of Regional Sea Level and Its Components Over 1993-2015

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020JC017123

关键词

-

资金

  1. ANR [ANR-13-BS06-0007-01]
  2. CNES through the Ocean Surface Topography Science Team (OSTST)
  3. French National Programme LEFE (Les Enveloppes Fluides de l'Environnement)-GMMC (Groupe Mission Mercator-Coriolis)-GMMC (Groupe Mission Mercator-Coriolis) by the CRATERE project
  4. ESA Living Planet Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Satellite altimetry data have shown a global mean sea level rise of 3.1 mm/yr since 1993, with large regional variability, highlighting complex structures. A recent study revealed that chaotic variability in over 38% of the global ocean area may hinder the attribution of regional sea level trends. This study focuses on atmospherically forced and chaotic interannual variability of regional sea level components, showing that the chaotic interannual variability has a significant impact on sea level components in various regions.
Satellite altimetry data have revealed a global mean sea level rise of 3.1 mm/yr since 1993 with large regional sea level variability. These remote data highlight complex structures especially in strongly eddying regions. A recent study showed that over 38% of the global ocean area, the chaotic variability may hinder the attribution to the atmospheric forcing of regional sea level trends from 1993 to 2015. This study aims to complement this work by focusing on the atmospherically forced and chaotic interannual variability of regional sea level and its components. At interannual time scales, variability can hamper the detection of regional sea level trends. A global 1/4 degrees ocean/sea-ice 50-member ensemble simulation is analyzed to disentangle the imprints of the atmospheric forcing and of the chaotic ocean variability on the interannual variability of regional sea level and of its steric and manometric components over 1993-2015. The atmospherically forced and chaotic interannual variabilities of sea level mainly have a steric origin, except in coastal areas. The chaotic part of the interannual variability of sea level and its components is stronger in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans than in the Indian Ocean. The chaotic part of the interannual variance of sea level and of its steric component exceeds 20% over 48% of the global ocean area; this fractional area reduces to 26% for the manometric component. These results confirm the substantial imprint of the chaotic interannual variability on sea level components, questioning in several regions the attribution of their observed evolution to atmospheric causes. Plain Language Summary Since the early 1990s, satellite altimetry has become the main observing system for continuously measuring the sea level variations with a near global coverage. It has revealed a global mean sea level rise of 3.1 mm/yr since 1993 with large regional sea level variability that differs from the mean estimate. These measurements highlight complex structures especially for the western boundary currents (Gulf Stream or Kuroshio) or the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Recent studies based on numerical modeling showed that the ocean spontaneously generates a chaotic intrinsic variability that substantially impacts the sea level interannual-to-decadal variability and its long-term trends. It is important to note that sea level observations simultaneously record these chaotic variations in the ocean but also the response to the atmospheric forcings. Here, we use a 50-member ensemble ocean simulation to disentangle the atmospherically forced and chaotic parts of the interannual variability of sea level and of its steric and manometric components. We found that, in several regions, the chaotic interannual variability has a large imprint on sea level components. While these results do not question the anthropic origin of global mean sea level rise, they give new insights into the oceanic vs. nonoceanic origin of regional interannual variability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据