期刊
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 126, 期 9, 页码 -出版社
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020JD034190
关键词
major Arctic ozone loss; prediction; strong stratospheric polar vortex
资金
- National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0602104]
- ISF-NSFC joint research program [3259/19]
- European Research Council starting grant under the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [677756]
This study reports on the strong stratospheric polar vortex in March 2020 and its coupling with Arctic ozone loss and predictability. Weak upward propagation of waves into the stratosphere in winter-early spring led to less ozone-rich air being transported to the Arctic stratosphere, contributing to around 40% of total Arctic ozone loss in March. Despite underestimating the Arctic total ozone, this extremely strong polar vortex event improved surface predictability on subseasonal timescales.
Using reanalysis and real-time forecasts from 11 sub-seasonal to seasonal (S2S) models, the strong stratospheric polar vortex in March 2020 coupled with Arctic ozone loss and their predictability are reported in this study. Arctic ozone reached a minimum value in March 2020 similar to the events in 1997 and 2011. Upward propagation of waves into the stratosphere in winter-early spring was anomalously weak, and the weakened Brewer-Dobson circulation transported less ozone-rich air to the Arctic stratosphere in November 2019-March 2020, which contributes around 40% of the total Arctic ozone loss in March, with the residual mainly explained by the chemical loss. Anomalous upwelling in the Arctic further cooled and intensified the polar vortex for ozone depletion and weak mixing, preventing recovery of ozone in early spring 2020. The polar vortex intensity and Arctic total ozone are strongly coupled, so a prediction of Arctic total ozone becomes possible for S2S models using metrics of the polar vortex as a proxy. The prediction of the strong stratospheric polar vortex in late March 2020 is assessed for four common initializations (February 27, March 5, March 12, and March 19) for S2S models. Displacement of the polar vortex toward the Western Hemisphere can only be forecasted in the two later initializations, and its intensity anomaly is underestimated in nearly all of those forecasts. Therefore, the empirical model using the S2S outputs also underestimates the Arctic total ozone. Despite this underestimation, this extremely strong polar vortex event led to improved surface predictability on subseasonal timescales: near-surface temperature and precipitation are well forecasted 2-3 weeks in advance.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据