4.6 Article

COVID-19 in People With Schizophrenia: Potential Mechanisms Linking Schizophrenia to Poor Prognosis

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.666067

关键词

schizophrenia; COVID-19; severe mental illness; SARS-CoV-2; first episode psychosis; psychosis

资金

  1. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) [16/137/107]
  2. NIHR (Doctoral Research Fellowship) [DRF-2018-11-ST2018]
  3. Medical Research Council (MRC) UK [MR/R020981/1]
  4. NIHR Applied Research Centre (ARC) West Midlands
  5. MRC [MR/R020981/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the increased risk of adverse outcomes from COVID-19 in patients with schizophrenia is crucial, and further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
As the global burden of mortality from COVID-19 continues to rise, an understanding of who is most at risk of adverse outcomes is of paramount importance. Pre-existing cardiometabolic, renal and respiratory diseases as well as old age are well-established risk factors associated with disease severity and mortality among patients with COVID-19. However, mounting evidence also indicates an increased susceptibility to, and risk of adverse outcomes from COVID-19 in people with schizophrenia, independent of age and comorbidity. Therefore, elucidating the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms which may increase the risk of poor outcomes in people with schizophrenia is of crucial importance. Here, we provide a narrative on the current understanding of COVID-19 in patients with schizophrenia and propose potential mechanisms which may link schizophrenia with an increased susceptibility to, and greater risk of adverse outcomes from COVID-19. Given the existing knowledge gaps, robust clinical and biological studies are required to further our understanding of some of these underlying mechanisms, so that effective prevention and treatment strategies for COVID-19 in patients with schizophrenia can be developed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据