4.6 Review

ICD-11 Personality Disorders: Utility and Implications of the New Model

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.655548

关键词

personality disorder; classification; domains; diagnosis; ICD-11

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ICD-11 classification of personality disorders represents a paradigm shift in diagnosis, abolishing all previous categories except for a general description of personality disorder and allowing for specification of severity. It describes patient behavior using five personality trait domains and shows alignment with the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Early evidence on the reliability and validity of the new model is promising, but wider adoption by clinicians in regular clinical practice is needed for its success.
The ICD-11 classification of personality disorders represents a paradigm shift in diagnosis. This was felt necessary because previous personality disorder classifications had major problems. These included unnecessary complexity, inconsistency with data on normal personality traits, and minimal consideration of severity despite this being shown to be the major predictor of outcome. The ICD-11 classification abolishes all categories of personality disorder except for a general description of personality disorder. This diagnosis can be further specified as mild, moderate, or severe. Patient behavior can be described using one or more of five personality trait domains; negative affectivity, dissociality, anankastia, detachment, and disinhibition. Clinicians may also specify a borderline pattern qualifier. The ICD-11 shows considerable alignment with the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Early evidence around the reliability and validity of the new model appear promising, although at present there is still limited specific evidence due to the model being so recently finalized. However, for the model to be successful, it needs to be embraced by clinicians and used widely in normal clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据