4.7 Article

A Diagnostic Model for Screening Diabetic Retinopathy Using the Hand-Held Electroretinogram Device RETeval

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.632457

关键词

diabetic retinopathy; electroretinogram; diagnostic model; risk factor; decision tree

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2015A030313019]
  2. Sun Yat-sen Clinical Research Cultivation Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study constructed a proper model for screening diabetic retinopathy (DR) using RETeval. By combining the DR risk assessment protocol with the decision tree model, it improved the sensitivity of diagnosing DR, making it more suitable for DR screening than the current protocol.
Purpose: To construct a proper model to screen for diabetic retinopathy (DR) with the RETeval. Method: This was a cross-sectional study. Two hundred thirty-two diabetic patients and seventy controls were recruited. The DR risk assessment protocol was performed to obtain subjects' DR risk score using the RETeval. Afterwards, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the best cutoff for diagnosing DR. Random forest and decision tree models were constructed. Results: With increasing DR severity, the DR score gradually increased. When the DR score was used to diagnose DR, the ROC curve had an area under the curve of 0.881 (95% confidence interval: 0.836-0.927, P < 0.001), with a best cutoff value of 22.95, a sensitivity of 74.3% (95 CI: 66.0%similar to 82.6%), and a specificity of 90.6% (95 CI: 83.7%similar to 94.8%). The top four risk factors selected by the random forest were used to construct the decision tree for diagnosing DR, which had a sensitivity of 93.3% (95% CI: 86.3%similar to 97.0%) and a specificity of 80.3% (95% CI: 72.1%similar to 86.6%). Conclusions: The DR risk assessment protocol combined with the decision tree model was innovatively used to evaluate the risk of DR, improving the sensitivity of diagnosis, which makes this method more suitable than the current protocol for DR screening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据