4.6 Article

Acquired Resistance to Isoniazid During Isoniazid Monotherapy in a Subject with Latent Infection Following Household Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis Contact: A Case Report

期刊

INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 1505-1509

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S304799

关键词

latent tuberculosis infection; LTBI; treatment; acquired drug resistance; drug-resistant TB; subclinical TB; case report

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This case report highlights the importance of appropriate treatment and prompt diagnosis in eliminating tuberculosis. The patient initially diagnosed with latent tuberculosis infection later developed active TB disease with drug resistance, but showed improvement and no recurrence after individualized anti-TB treatment for 20 months. The study suggests that traditional diagnostic methods may not be sufficient to differentiate different stages of TB or LTBI.
Appropriate treatment is the key element in eliminating tuberculosis (TB), and requires prompt diagnosis. We presented a case of a household contact of rifampicin-resistant TB revealing reactive IFN-gamma release assay with unsuspicious clinical and radiologic examinations. She was diagnosed with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and treated with isoniazid monotherapy. On the ninth month, she developed a progressive cough and was found to harbor active TB disease with added resistance to isoniazid. An individualized anti-TB regimen consisting of moxifloxacin, kanamycin, prothionamide, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide was prescribed for 20 months, leading to sputum culture conversion and improvement of the reported symptom. No recurrence was observed on one-year follow-up. Assuming high compliance to therapy, we propose that the patient may have been under-diagnosed and received sub-optimal treatment leading to acquired-drug resistance. Conventional diagnosis methods based on immunological assay and radiographical findings may be insufficient to distinguish the incipient and subclinical states of TB from LTBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据