4.7 Article

Praseodymium iridium oxide as a competitive electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction in acid media

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS
卷 64, 期 9, 页码 2193-2201

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40843-020-1598-5

关键词

oxygen evolution reaction; water splitting; electrocatalysts; non-noble metal; energy conversion

资金

  1. Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province, China [ts201712045]
  2. Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program(SPKRDP) [2019GGX102069]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China [ZR2018BB008]
  4. Qingdao University of Science and Technology [0100229001, 010029081, 010029075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cubic fluorite-type praseodymium iridium oxide consisting of IrOx surface (IrOx/Pr3IrO7) has been reported with improved activity and stability, showing competitive activity and fast reaction kinetics compared to benchmark IrO2 in acid media.
Amorphous iridium oxides (IrOx) are highly active for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in acid media; however, it is generally unstable compared with commercial IrO2. Recently, many non-noble metal-iridium mixed oxides are prepared for catalyzing OER efficiently. Herein, we report a cubic fluorite-type praseodymium iridium oxide with the surface of IrOx (IrOx/Pr3IrO7) that shows the improved activity and stability in 0.1 mol L-1 HClO4 solution, characterized by an overpotential of 305 mV at the benchmark of 10 mA cm(-2) and a small Tafel slope of 37 mV dec(-1), indicating a fast reaction kinetics and a competitive activity compared with the benchmark IrO2 and most reported electrocatalysts. The initial potential increases by less than 0.07 V after continuous OER testing over 60,000 s. In contrast, IrO2 becomes nearly inactive for the OER within 20,000 s. Density functional theory calculations uncover that the optimal energy level path follows lattice oxygen mechanism (LOM). This work enlarges the family of the IrOx-type OER electrocatalyst in acid media.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据