4.7 Article

Experimental study on the root-deck fatigue crack on orthotropic steel decks

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109601

关键词

Orthotropic steel deck; Fatigue crack growth; Weld root crack; Beach mark; S-N curve

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51908423, 51678437,51978514, 51878493]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The root-deck crack is a significant fatigue issue on OSDs, impacting bridge serviceability and being challenging to detect. Fatigue testing and microscopic examination identified lack of penetration at the weld root and high stress as key factors in crack initiation and propagation. Comparing with other fatigue test results, differences between root-deck crack and toe-deck crack failures were highlighted, providing insights for improved fatigue design of OSDs.
The root-deck crack is one of the most concerned fatigue issues on orthotropic steel decks (OSDs) as it is unfavorable for the serviceability of the bridge while being difficult to detect. In this paper, the fatigue test was designed and carried out by using beach marking method to record the crack propagation process. By conducting microscopic examination on the fracture surface, it shows that the lack of penetration (LOP) at the weld root, combined with the high stress at that site, results in the fatigue crack initiation and propagation to penetrate the deck. Additionally, the fatigue assessment in terms of the S-N curves for such a failure mode was carried out. With comparison to other fatigue test results from the literature, it manifests the differences between the specimens failed due to root-deck crack and toe-deck crack, which can benefit the fatigue design of OSDs by giving a more specific and process-oriented results. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据