4.7 Article

Microstructural design strategy to maintain the brittle fracture toughness of hard-soft dual phase steel after cyclic plastic strain

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109603

关键词

Brittle fracture; Dual-phase; Material damage; Strain gradient plasticity; Prestrain

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHIGrant [JP19H00802, 18H05337]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H05337] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the change in material toughness in different ferrite/pearlite two-phase microstructures when cyclic prestrain occurs, suggesting directions for microstructural design of steel with lower risk of brittle fracture due to plastic deformation. Damage-resistant materials with sufficient strength can be proposed based on the findings.
Superstructures are seriously damaged because of plastic deformation when natural disasters, such as large earthquakes or unexpectedly large waves, occur. Therefore, there is a need to develop materials that are resistant to damage and fracture while maintaining a certain level of strength. In this paper, the difference in material toughness changes when cyclic prestrain occurs among different ferrite/pearlite two-phase microstructures were investigated. Synthetic analysis using strain gradient plasticity (SGP) theory, one of the crystal plasticity theories, was carried out, and conventional macroscopic material damage consideration rules were employed. Then, it was suggested that the amount of material damage changes among the different microstructures. In addition, a parametric study using SGP theory is performed to suggest directions for the microstructural design of steel with a lower risk of brittle fracture due to plastic deformation. As a result, damage-resistant materials with sufficient strength can be proposed. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据