4.7 Article

Efficacy of graphene nanosheets on the plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coating: Improved strength, toughness and in-vitro bioperformance with osteoblast

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109585

关键词

Ceramic-matrix composites; Plasma spray; Mechanical properties; Graphene nanosheet; Hydroxyapatite; In-vitro biocompatibility

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51471113, 51275326]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A graphene nanosheet (GNS) reinforced HA coating was developed using plasma spray for biomedical applications. The coating showed improved strength, toughness, and enhanced biocompatibility, making it a promising candidate for bone regeneration and implantation.
Graphene nanosheet (GNS) reinforced HA coating on Ti6Al4V substrate, fabricated using plasma spray, was developed for biomedical applications. Microstructural observation corroborated that the adding GNSs homoge-neously distributed in the GNS/HA coating with typical lamellar structure featured by GNSs acting as binder be-tween the discrete HA splats. Meanwhile, GNSs were observed to get in direct contact with HA matrix and form a clean GNS-HA interface without interfacial product. Results of various indentation tests showed simultaneous improvement in both indentation yield strength (similar to 379 MPa) and fracture toughness (0.78 +/- 0.17 MPam1/2), mainly attributing to synergetic toughening and strengthening mechanisms associated with the adding GNSs such as load transfer, GNS pull-out, inter-layer sliding of a GNS, crack branching, GNS bridging and crack deflec-tion. In addition, the GNS/HA coating exhibited improved biocompatible with MG-63 cell in terms of its attach-ment, adhesion strength, proliferation and differentiation. Hence, the GNS/HA composite coating with improved strength, toughness and enhanced biocompatibility makes it a promising candidate for bone regeneration and implantation. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据