4.7 Article Data Paper

A food web including parasites for kelp forests of the Santa Barbara Channel, California

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00880-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lerner Gray Fund for Marine Research
  2. Lewis and Clark Fund for Field Exploration and Research
  3. UCSB Worster Award
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Program [NNX14AR62A]
  5. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program (BOEM) [MC15AC00006]
  6. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  7. USGS Ecosystems Mission Area

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study constructed a high-resolution topological food web for kelp forests, including parasites, with a large number of nodes and links. It can be utilized to predict ecosystem responses to change and advance the development of theory.
We built a high-resolution topological food web for the kelp forests of the Santa Barbara Channel, California, USA that includes parasites and significantly improves resolution compared to previous webs. The 1,098 nodes and 21,956 links in the web describe an economically, socially, and ecologically vital system. Nodes are broken into life-stages, with 549 free-living life-stages (492 species from 21 Phyla) and 549 parasitic life-stages (450 species from 10 Phyla). Links represent three kinds of trophic interactions, with 9,352 predator-prey links, 2,733 parasite-host links and 9,871 predator-parasite links. All decisions for including nodes and links are documented, and extensive metadata in the node list allows users to filter the node list to suit their research questions. The kelp-forest food web is more species-rich than any other published food web with parasites, and it has the largest proportion of parasites. Our food web may be used to predict how kelp forests may respond to change, will advance our understanding of parasites in ecosystems, and fosters development of theory that incorporates large networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据