4.5 Article

Validity of Self-Reported Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Japan Nurses' Health Study

期刊

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 237-244

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S304939

关键词

validation; self-reported diagnosis; osteoporosis; prospective cohort study; Japan Nurses' Health Study

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI) [18H04069]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H04069] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that self-reported diagnoses of osteoporosis in young and middle-aged women had a high negative predictive value of 98.9%. However, the positive predictive value was slightly lower, suggesting that additional confirmation through a questionnaire could improve accuracy.
Purpose: Although the validity of self-reported osteoporosis is often questioned, validation studies are lacking. This study was performed to investigate how well self-reported diagnoses of osteoporosis agreed with validated clinical information in young and middle-aged women in the Japan Nurses' Health Study (JNHS), a nationwide prospective cohort study of nursing professionals. Patients and Methods: Data were reviewed for 15,717 subjects from the combined cohorts of the JNHS and a preceding pilot study (Gunma Nurses' Health Study). The subjects' mean age at the baseline (BL) survey was 41.6 +/- 8.3 years, and the mean followup period was 11.5 +/- 4.4 years. Participating nurses were mailed a follow-up questionnaire every 2 years. Respondents who self-reported a positive osteoporosis diagnosis during the study period were sent an additional confirmation questionnaire to corroborate the details. Results: The number (proportion) of women with osteoporosis was 884 (5.6%) [primary osteoporosis, 812 (5.2%); secondary osteoporosis, 72 (0.5%)]. The cumulative incidence of osteoporosis at the age of 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 years was estimated to be 0.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.2), 1.1% (0.9-1.3), 7.7% (7.0-8.4), 23.6% (21.6-25.7), and 54.2% (40.2-68.1), respectively. For BL and regular follow-up + expert review versus BL and regular follow-up + confirmation questionnaire + expert review, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 61.3% versus 85.6% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.9% versus 98.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Self-reporting was associated with a high NPV for the incidence of osteoporosis. Although the PPV was slightly lower, additional corroborations by confirmation questionnaire might improve the PPV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据