4.2 Article

UPPER ORDOVICIAN THYLACOCEPHALA ( EUARTHROPODA, EUCRUSTACEA) FROM BOHEMIA INDICATE EARLY ECOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION

期刊

PAPERS IN PALAEONTOLOGY
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 1727-1751

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/spp2.1363

关键词

Concavicaridida; Conchyliocaridida; Czech Republic; Letna Formation; Sandbian

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thylacocephala is a clade of marine bivalved euarthropods, but little is known about their detailed anatomy and tagmosis. Some were fully nektic, while others had a nekto-benthic mode of life. The new finds indicate that ecological differentiation in Thylacocephala may have been achieved early in their evolution.
Thylacocephala is a clade of marine bivalved euarthropods generally considered to belong to Eucrustacea, although their affinities within this group remain unsettled. Detailed thylacocephalan anatomy and tagmosis is poorly known, and the majority of taxa have been described based only on the valves of the carapace. While some thylacocephalans are considered to have been fully nektic, others probably had a nekto-benthic mode of life. The group makes its last appearance in the Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon, while the previously oldest definite record is from the Silurian of Wisconsin, USA. This paper describes two new thylacocephalans, Pseudoprotozoea irenae gen. et sp. nov. and Bohemiacaris libori gen. et sp. nov. from the Sandbian (Upper Ordovician) Letna Formation of Bohemia (Czech Republic). Apart from the carapaces, both fossils preserve some evidence of the appendages. Remarkably, even though the newly described taxa represent the oldest unequivocal thylacocephalans, their carapaces display several characters most similar to those of Mesozoic groups. Whether these similarities reflect true close relationships and Ordovician origins for these groups or are only the result of convergent evolution is uncertain. Regardless, the new finds show that ecological differentiation between fully nektic and nektobenthic lifestyles was probably achieved early in the evolution of Thylacocephala.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据