4.8 Review

The promises, challenges and pathways to room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries

期刊

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwab050

关键词

room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries; sulfur cathodes; polysulfide shuttling effects; Na dendrite formation; electro catalysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22005092, 52074113, 22005091, 51991343, 51991340, 61804050, 51872086]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds of the Central Universities [531107051048]
  3. Hunan Key Laboratory of Two-Dimensional Materials [2018TP1010]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M652757, 2020M672490, 2020TQ0091]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the advantages, challenges, and strategies of room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries (RT-Na-S batteries), reviews recent progress, and provides a forward-looking perspective on achieving high-energy-density and robust batteries.
Room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries (RT-Na-S batteries) are attractive for large-scale energy storage applications owing to their high storage capacity as well as the rich abundance and low cost of the materials. Unfortunately, their practical application is hampered by severe challenges, such as low conductivity of sulfur and its reduced products, volume expansion, polysulfide shuttling effect and Na dendrite formation, which can lead to rapid capacity fading. The review discusses the Na-S-energy-storage chemistry, highlighting its promise, key challenges and potential strategies for large-scale energy storage systems. Specifically, we review the electrochemical principles and the current technical challenges of RT-Na-S batteries, and discuss the strategies to address these obstacles. In particular, we give a comprehensive review of recent progresses in cathodes, anodes, electrolytes, separators and cell configurations, and provide a forward-looking perspective on strategies toward robust high-energy-density RT-Na-S batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据