4.5 Article

Investigating the characteristics of a magnetorheological fluid damper through CFD modeling

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH EXPRESS
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/abfcf6

关键词

semi-active dampers; magneto-rheological fluid (MRF); magneto-rheological damper (MRD); computational fluid dynamics (CFD)

资金

  1. Qatar National Research Foundation (QNRF) [NPRP-11S-1220-170112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CFD analysis was conducted on a mono-tube vehicle MRF damper with fluid MRF-132DG, showing a 70% increase in viscosity values with elevated magnetic field excitation current. The results of CFD simulation were compared to experiments, demonstrating good match and validating the accuracy of the analysis.
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis is conducted on mono-tube vehicle MRF damper investigated experimentally in a previous study. In this study, the fluid of the type MRF-132DG was inserted inside a damper of a car rear suspension system. The CFD analysis describes the fluid flow through the internal orifices between the compression and the rebound chambers. Averaged Navier-Stokes equations were solved by the SIMPLE method, and the RNG k-epsilon was used to model the turbulence at the fluid crossing through the orifices. All the CFD model boundary conditions' values were set to the same values reported in the previous experimental study, except for the viscosity values. When varying the applied magnetic field density, the changes of MRF's viscosity values were assessed by using a viscosity meter. Results showed a viscosity increase of 70% when the magnetic field excitation current was elevated from 0 A to 5 A. The damping forced and damping values were calculated using the rebound and compression static pressures obtained from the contour plots. It was also observed that the damping values exponentially increase with the increase in viscosity. The results of the CFD simulation were compared against those from the experiments, and good matching was observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据