4.5 Article

Global Differences in Burden and Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease in Acute Heart Failure REPORT-HF

期刊

JACC-HEART FAILURE
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 349-359

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.12.015

关键词

evidence-based pharmacotherapy; heart failure; ischemic heart disease; outcomes

资金

  1. Novartis
  2. National Medical Research Council of Singapore
  3. Boston Scientific
  4. Bayer
  5. Roche Diagnostics
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. Medtronic
  8. Vifor Pharma
  9. German Ministry for Education and Research
  10. Pfizer
  11. Vifor
  12. National Institutes of Health
  13. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  14. American Heart Association
  15. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  16. Olink Proteomics
  17. European Union
  18. Servier
  19. Boehringer Ingelheim

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated global differences in prevalence, association with outcome, and treatment of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). It found that IHD was more common in low-income countries and was associated with higher 1-year mortality, especially in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Patients in regions with the greatest burden of IHD were less likely to receive coronary revascularization and treatment for IHD.
OBJECTIVES The primary aim of the current study was to investigate global differences in prevalence, association with outcome, and treatment of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in the REPORT-HF (International Registry to Assess Medical Practice With Longitudinal Observation for Treatment of Heart Failure) registry. BACKGROUND Data on IHD in patients with AHF are primarily from Western Europe and North America. Little is known about global differences in treatment and prognosis of patients with IHD and AHF. METHODS A total of 18,539 patients with AHF were prospectively enrolled from 44 countries and 365 centers in the REPORT-HF registry. Patients with a history of coronary artery disease, an ischemic event causing admission for AHF, or coronary revascularization were classified as IHD. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with and without IHD were explored. RESULTS Compared with 8,766 (47%) patients without IHD, 9,773 (53%) patients with IHD were older, more likely to have a left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]), and reported more comorbidities. IHD was more common in lower income compared with high-income countries (61% vs. 48%). Patients with IHD from countries with low health care expenditure per capita or without health insurance less likely underwent coronary revascularization or used anticoagulants at discharge. IHD was independently associated with worse cardiovascular death (hazard ratio: 1.21; 95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 1.35). The association between IHD and cardiovascular death was stronger in HFrEF compared with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (p(interaction) <0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this large global contemporary cohort of patients with AHF, IHD was more common in low-income countries and conveyed worse 1-year mortality, especially in HFrEF. Patients in regions with the greatest burden of IHD were less likely to receive coronary revascularization and treatment for IHD. (C) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据