4.8 Review

ILC-You in the Thymus: A Fresh Look at Innate Lymphoid Cell Development

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.681110

关键词

T-cell development; innate lymphoid cell development; layered hematopoiesis; neonatal; fetal; origins of lymphocytes

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [PJT-148681, PJT156235]
  2. AllerGen Network Centre of Excellence
  3. CIHR Frederick Banting & Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship-Master's Program (CGS-M) Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) has expanded our understanding of innate immunity and immune cell interactions at epithelial barrier sites. ILCs, resembling helper T cell subsets in function, differ from T cells in terms of surface receptors and development pathways, potentially originating from T cell progenitors during neonatal development.
The discovery of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) has revolutionized our understanding of innate immunity and immune cell interactions at epithelial barrier sites. Their presence and maintenance are critical for modulating immune homeostasis, responding to injury or infection, and repairing damaged tissues. To date, ILCs have been defined by a set of transcription factors, surface antigens and cytokines, and their functions resemble those of three major classes of helper T cell subsets, Th1, Th2 and Th17. Despite this, the lack of antigen-specific surface receptors and the notion that ILCs can develop in the absence of the thymic niche have clearly set them apart from the T-cell lineage and promulgated a dogma that ILCs develop directly from progenitors in the bone marrow. Interestingly however, emerging studies have challenged the BM-centric view of adult ILC development and suggest that ILCs could arise neonatally from developing T cell progenitors. In this review, we discuss ILC development in parallel to T-cell development and summarize key findings that support a T-cell-centric view of ILC ontogeny.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据