4.8 Review

Prenatal Immunity and Influences on Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Associated Neonatal Disorders

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.650709

关键词

NEC = necrotizing enterocolitis; TL4 – Toll-like receptor 4; microbiota (microorganism); prematurity and low birth weight; pediatric sepsis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, USA [R01 DK1117186, R01 DK121824]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prior to birth, neonates have limited exposure to pathogens and undergo a complex transition from intra-uterine to postnatal environment, which can lead to disorders like necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature and very low birth weight infants due to their immature immune systems. Understanding the interactions between the immune system, maternal uterine environment, microbes, nutrition, and other factors in neonatal pathologies like NEC is crucial for considering the long-term health effects on affected children.
Prior to birth, the neonate has limited exposure to pathogens. The transition from the intra-uterine to the postnatal environment initiates a series of complex interactions between the newborn host and a variety of potential pathogens that persist over the first few weeks of life. This transition is particularly complex in the case of the premature and very low birth weight infant, who may be susceptible to many disorders as a result of an immature and underdeveloped immune system. Chief amongst these disorders is necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), an acute inflammatory disorder that leads to necrosis of the intestine, and which can affect multiple systems and have the potential to result in long term effects if the infant is to survive. Here, we examine what is known about the interplay of the immune system with the maternal uterine environment, microbes, nutritional and other factors in the pathogenesis of neonatal pathologies such as NEC, while also taking into consideration the effects on the long-term health of affected children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据