4.6 Article

Permeability of Coking Coals and Patterns of Its Change in Leninsky Area, Kuznetsk Coal Basin, Russia

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11093969

关键词

coal; permeability; cleats; anisotropy; stress; gas drainage

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-77-00069]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-77-00069] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study predicted the permeability of gas-bearing coking coals in the Leninsky area of the Kuznetsk coal basin. Laboratory studies showed that as confining pressure increased, coal permeability decreased, and as depth increased, permeability decreased by 61-82%. These findings can be useful for designing industrial works for coal methane extraction in the region.
A prediction of the permeability of gas-bearing coking coals in the Leninsky area, Kuznetsk coal basin (Kuzbass), which is promising for the production of coal methane, was performed. The results of laboratory studies of coal permeability and cleat compressibility under hydrostatic stress conditions are presented. As the confining pressure increased by 8 times (from 1 MPa to 8 MPa), the coal permeability perpendicular to the butt cleat direction decreased by 6.7 times (from 60 mD to 9 mD). The coal cleat compressibility was 0.085 MPa-1. On the basis of the results of filtration tests and microstructural analysis of the coking coals, we provide the estimation of the permeability anisotropy along the bedding planes (perpendicular to the face and butt cleat directions). The predicted dependences of gas-bearing coking coal permeability perpendicular to the butt and face cleat directions on depth and on features of coal seam bedding were determined under uniaxial strain conditions. It was found that in the coking coal depth intervals, as the depth increased, their permeability decreased by 61-82%. The obtained results can be used to select facilities and to design industrial works for the extraction of coal methane in the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据