4.7 Article

Measurement of -particle quenching in LAB based scintillator in independent small-scale experiments

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
卷 76, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3959-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Germany [ZU-123/5]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) of the United Kingdom [ST/J001007/1, ST/K001329/1, ST/M00001X/1]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0012704]
  4. STFC [ST/J001007/1, ST/H000887/2, ST/M00001X/1, ST/K001329/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K001329/1, ST/M00001X/1, ST/K001329/1 nEDM, ST/H000887/2, ST/J001007/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The -particle light response of liquid scintillators based on linear alkylbenzene (LAB) has been measured with three different experimental approaches. In the first approach, -particles were produced in the scintillator via C(n,)Be reactions. In the second approach, the scintillator was loaded with 2 % of Sm providing an -emitter, Sm, as an internal source. In the third approach, a scintillator flask was deployed into the water-filled SNO+ detector and the radioactive contaminants Rn, Po and Po provided the -particle signal. The behavior of the observed -particle light outputs are in agreement with each case successfully described by Birks' law. The resulting Birks parameter kB ranges from to cm/MeV. In the first approach, the -particle light response was measured simultaneously with the light response of recoil protons produced via neutron-proton elastic scattering. This enabled a first time a direct comparison of kB describing the proton and the -particle response of LAB based scintillator. The observed kB values describing the two light response functions deviate by more than . The presented results are valuable for all current and future detectors, using LAB based scintillator as target, since they depend on an accurate knowledge of the scintillator response to different particles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据