4.6 Article

Time Travel to the Past of Bosnia and Herzegovina through Virtual and Augmented Reality

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11083711

关键词

digital heritage; virtual reality; augmented reality; VR video; interactive digital storytelling; hyper-storytelling

资金

  1. IPA Crossborder project BH-MNE Amusing Museums, Visit Sarajevo
  2. BH Ministry of Civil Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper discusses the latest applications using VR and AR technologies for interactive digital storytelling about the history of Bosnia and Herzegovina, including the first BH VR documentary "Nine dissidents" and the Virtual Museum of Old Crafts that aims to preserve intangible heritage through Virtual Reality.
Bosnia and Herzegovina (BH) has a very picturesque past. Founded in 11th century, it has always been a crossroads of faiths and civilizations. Extended Reality (XR) technologies can finally take us to time travel into this history, enable us to experience past events and meet historical characters. In this paper, we overview the latest applications we developed that use Virtual Reality (VR) video, Virtual and Augmented Reality (AR) for interactive digital storytelling about BH history. Nine dissidents is the first BH VR documentary, tackling a still tricky subject of dissidents in the Socialist Yugoslavia, artists and writers falsely accused, persecuted and still forbidden. Virtual Museum of Old Crafts aims to present and preserve crafts intangible heritage through Virtual Reality. Battle on Neretva VR is recreating a famous WWII battle offering the users to experience it and meet comrade Tito, the commander of the Yugoslav Liberation Army. Sarajevo 5D shows the cultural monuments from Sarajevo that do not exist anymore in physical form using Augmented Reality. Through user experience studies, we measure the user immersion and edutainment of these applications and show the potential of XR for the presentation and preservation of cultural heritage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据