4.6 Review

Application of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds as Compatibilizers for Polymer Blends and Polymer Composites-A Concise Review

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11073167

关键词

surfactant; ionic liquid; polymer blend; polymer composite; compatibilizer

资金

  1. Universiti Putra Malaysia [9001103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on the application of two types of QACs as compatibilizers for polymer blends and polymer composites, specifically quaternary ammonium surfactants (QASs) and quaternary ammonium ionic liquids (QAILs), due to their unique chemical structure and interaction capabilities with polymer components. The influence of QASs and QAILs on the thermo-mechanical properties of the polymer blends and composites is also discussed, aiming to provide insights for researchers in this field.
A wide variety of quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) have escalated the attraction of researchers to explore the application of QACs. The compounds have frequently been synthesized through alkylation or quaternization of tertiary amines with alkyl halides. Recently, QACs have been applied to compatibilize polymer blends and polymer composites in improving their thermo-mechanical properties. This concise review concentrates on the application of two types of QACs as compatibilizers for polymer blends and polymer composites. The types of QACs that were effectively applied in the blends and composites are quaternary ammonium surfactants (QASs) and quaternary ammonium ionic liquids (QAILs). They have been chosen for the discussion because of their unique chemical structure which can interact with the polymer blend and composite components. The influence of QASs and QAILs on the thermo-mechanical properties of the polymer blends and polymer composites is also described. This review could be helpful for the polymer blend and polymer composite researchers and induce more novel ideas in this research area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据