4.6 Article

Optical Outcoupling Efficiency in Polymer Light-Emitting Diodes

期刊

ADVANCED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.202100155

关键词

broad recombination profiles; Langevin recombination; optical outcoupling; polymer light‐ emitting diodes; trap‐ assisted recombination

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study combines electrical and optical model calculations to demonstrate that the light-outcoupling efficiency in PLEDs is influenced by electron traps and the anisotropy factor of optical dipoles. Electron trapping confines recombination near the cathode, resulting in strong optical trapping in surface plasmon polariton modes.
The electrical properties of polymer-based light-emitting diodes (PLEDs) have been extensively studied, resulting in quantitative device models. However, for a complete description of the optoelectronic properties of a PLED, the obtained recombination profiles need to be integrated with an optical model describing the local outcoupling efficiency of the generated light. In this work, combined electrical and optical model calculations are presented, demonstrating that the light-outcoupling efficiency in PLEDs is governed by the presence of electron traps and the anisotropy factor of optical dipoles. Electron trapping confines the recombination in a region close to cathode, resulting in strong optical trapping in surface plasmon polariton modes. Trap-filling leads to a voltage-dependent recombination profile and optical outcoupling efficiency. For a typical electron trap density of approximate to 10(23) m(-3), the calculated outcoupling efficiency raises from 5.5% at 2 V to 10.4% at 5 V in case of isotropic emitters. For conjugated polymers such as super yellow poly(p-phenylene vinylene) with the chains preferentially aligned in the plane of the film, the outcoupling efficiency can reach approximate to 18% at 5 V. Elimination of electron trapping would allow for a further enhancement up to 24%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据