4.6 Article

Photoinduced Synaptic Behavior of InxTiyO Thin Film Transistors

期刊

ADVANCED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.202001049

关键词

atomic layer deposition; oxide semiconductors; photo‐ induced memory; thin film transistors

资金

  1. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) - Korean government [20ZB1170]
  2. Institute for Information & Communications Technology Promotion - Korean government [2016-0-00576]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

InxTiyO films deposited via atomic layer deposition method offer an excellent alternative to In2O3 films in TFT channels, allowing modulation of cut-off wavelength in the UV region while affecting the on-current level.
Herein, InxTiyO films are successfully deposited via the atomic layer deposition method, which involves sub-cycles of In2O3 and TiO2 application at a growth temperature of 200 degrees C. InxTiyO films are an excellent alternative to In2O3 films for use in channels of thin film transistors (TFTs), and can be used to avoid issues such as metal-like conduction characteristics and undesirable negative shifts. Adjusting the addition of TiO2 to In2O3 enables modulation of the cut-off wavelength in the UV region. However, the addition of TiO2 adversely affects the on-current level. The TiO2 content in the InxTiyO films is optimized based on photosensitivity and current level, wherein the films are used as the channel layer in photo-TFTs; consequently, a photo-synaptic behavior is achieved. The InxTiyO film-based memory devices are programmed and erased using UV light and gate voltage, respectively, wherein deep trap sites at the interface between the InTiO and Al2O3 layers facilitate the retention of charge during memory operation. The memory on/off ratio deteriorates slightly with a lapse in retention time of 4 x 10(4) s after 20 program/erase (P/E) cycles. Moreover, in the InxTiyO-based TFTs, excellent linearity is achieved during potentiation due to a good photo-synaptic behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据