Functionalized Strategies and Mechanisms of the Emerging Mesh for Abdominal Wall Repair and Regeneration

Meshes have been the overwhelmingly popular choice for the repair of abdominal wall defects to retrieve the bodily integrity of musculofascial layer. Broadly, they are classified into synthetic, biological and composite mesh based on their mechanical and biocompatible features. With the development of anatomical repair techniques and the increasing requirements of constructive remodeling, however, none of these options satisfactorily manages the conditional repair. In both preclinical and clinical studies, materials/agents equipped with distinct functions have been characterized and applied to improve mesh-aided repair, with the importance of mesh functionalization being highlighted. However, limited information exists on systemic comparisons of the underlying mechanisms with respect to functionalized strategies, which are fundamental throughout repair and regeneration. Herein, we address this topic and summarize the current literature by subdividing common functions of the mesh into biomechanics-matched, macrophage-mediated, integration-enhanced, anti-infective and antiadhesive characteristics for a comprehensive overview. In particular, we elaborate their effects separately with respect to host response and integration and discuss their respective advances, challenges and future directions toward a clinical alternative. From the vastly different approaches, we provide insight into the mechanisms involved and offer suggestions for personalized modifications of these emerging meshes.

Automated summary

Meshes are commonly used for repairing abdominal wall defects, classified into synthetic, biological, and composite based on their mechanical and biocompatible features. However, none of the current options satisfactorily manage conditional repairs, leading to the development of materials/agents with distinct functions to improve mesh-aided repair. The importance of mesh functionalization has been highlighted, but limited information exists on systematic comparisons of the underlying mechanisms with respect to functionalized strategies.