3.8 Article

MXenes for Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis: Recent Advances and Current Challenges

期刊

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 1900-1913

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01763

关键词

MXenes; biocompatibility; nanosystems; drug delivery; MXene-based composites; cancer therapy; cancer diagnosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MXenes, with their unique physicochemical properties, show promising potential in cancer therapy and diagnosis. Despite challenges such as stability in physiological environments, sustained/controlled drug release, and biodegradability, the latest advancements in the field of targeted cancer therapy/diagnosis with MXenes are being emphasized.
MXenes endowed with several attractive physicochemical attributes, namely, specific large surface area, significant electrical conductivity, magnetism, low toxicity, luminescence, and high biocompatibility, have been considered as promising candidates for cancer therapy and theranostics. These two-dimensional (2D) nanostructures endowed with photothermal, chemotherapeutic synergistic, and photodynamic effects have shown promising potential for decidedly effectual and noninvasive anticancer treatments. They have been explored for photothermal/chemo-photothermal therapy (PTT) and for targeted anticancer drug delivery. Remarkably, MXenes with their unique optical properties have been employed for bioimaging and biosensing, and their excellent light-to-heat transition competence renders them an ideal biocompatible and decidedly proficient nanoscaled agent for PTT appliances. However, several important challenging issues still linger regarding their stability in physiological environments, sustained/controlled release of drugs, and biodegradability that need to be addressed. This Perspective emphasizes the latest advancements of MXenes and MXene-based materials in the domain of targeted cancer therapy/diagnosis, with a focus on the current trends, important challenges, and future perspectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据