4.3 Review

Microbial fuel cells: a comprehensive review for beginners

期刊

3 BIOTECH
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-021-02802-y

关键词

Microbial fuel cells; Microbial electrochemistry; Microbial electron transfer; Wastewater treatment; Alternate energy; Bioanode; Biocathode

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) have shown great potential in addressing energy security, global warming, and wastewater management, serving as an interdisciplinary research platform at the intersection of natural and engineering sciences. The wide range of variables influencing MFC performance has attracted research interest from various scientific disciplines, calling for collaboration in addressing research needs and advancing the technology further towards practical implementation.
Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) have shown immense potential as a one-stop solution for three major sustainability issues confronting the world today-energy security, global warming and wastewater management. MFCs represent a cross-disciplinary platform for research at the confluence of the natural and engineering sciences. The diversity of variables influencing performance of MFCs has garnered research interest across varied scientific disciplines since the beginning of this century. The increasing number of research publications has made it necessary to keep track of work being carried out by research groups across the globe and consolidate significant findings on a regular basis. Review articles are often the nodal points for beginners who are required to undertake an exploratory survey of literature to identify a suitable research problem. This 'review of reviews' is a ready-reckoner that directs readers to relevant reviews and research articles reporting significant developments in MFC research in the last two decades. The article also highlights the areas needing research attention which when addressed could take this technology a few more steps closer to practical implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据