4.5 Article

Acoustic Radiation Force on Small Spheres Due to Transient Acoustic Fields

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.044034

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51950410582, 61874033, 61674043]
  2. Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Government [18ZR1402600]
  3. State Key Lab of ASIC and System, Fudan University [2018MS003, 2020KF006]
  4. ISITE-ULNE (ERC)
  5. Institut Universitaire de France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces the concept of finite-duration pulses as the most general condition for deriving the acoustic radiation force. For small spheres, the Gor?kov formula is extended to unsteady acoustic fields, and the concept of acoustic contrast is suggested to express the acoustic radiation force. Experimental results show that the acoustic contrast can influence the action of the acoustic radiation force.
Acoustic radiation force is a net force experienced by an object under the action of an acoustic wave. Most theoretical models require the acoustic wave to be periodic, if not purely monofrequency, and are therefore irrelevant for the study of acoustic radiation force due to acoustic pulses. Here, we introduce the concept of finite-duration pulses, which is the most general condition to derive the acoustic radiation force. In the case of small spheres, we extend the Gor?kov formula to unsteady acoustic fields such as traveling pulses and interfering wave packets. In the latter case, our study suggests that the concept of acoustic contrast is also relevant to express the acoustic radiation force. For negative acoustic contrast particles, the acoustic trapping region narrows with shorter pulses, whereas positive contrast particles (such as biological cells) can fall in secondary traps when the pulse width deviates from an optimal value. This theoretical insight may help to improve the selectivity of pulsed acoustic tweezers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据