4.5 Article

Compensation of Shallow Donors by Gallium Vacancies in Monoclinicβ-Ga2O3

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.054010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-18-1-0507]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals the existence of a compensating level below the conduction band in the O2-annealed B-Ga2O3:Zr sample, possibly caused by the relaxed split Ga vacancy. The sample shows a significant increase in resistivity after annealing under oxygen atmosphere, and also exhibits unique vacancy characteristics and anisotropy in the monoclinic lattice.
Knowledge of the origin of deep levels and their impact on electrical properties is critical for device applications of ,B-Ga2O3. By annealing under an oxygen (O2) atmosphere, the resistivity in shallowdonor (zirconium) doped ,B-Ga2O3:Zr single crystals is found to increase by more than 10 orders of magnitude to (7 ? 4) ? 1010 S2 cm, which is comparable to the resistivity achieved by iron (Fe) acceptor doping of (5 ? 3) ? 1011 S2 cm. We combine thermoelectric effect spectroscopy and positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS), which are sensitive to deep levels and concentration of open-volume defects, with modeling of the electrical properties, to study these strongly compensated crystals. We find the compensating level in the O2-annealed ,B-Ga2O3:Zr sample to be located at (0.727 ? 0.021) eV (E 2*) below the conduction band, which correlates with a vacancy signal from PAS data. The defect is most likely the relaxed split Ga vacancy ViGa, rather than a simple gallium vacancy, considering theoretical predictions of a small energy barrier to relax. We observe that, due to the unique nature of these vacancies and anisotropy in the monoclinic lattice, the Doppler-broadening parameter is rather small compared with other widegap compounds, and in such a case the positron diffusion length is a suitable parameter to estimate the open-volume defect concentration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据