4.5 Article

Einstein-AEther gravity in the light of event horizon telescope observations of M87*

期刊

PHYSICS OF THE DARK UNIVERSE
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2021.100835

关键词

M87*observations; Event Horizon Telescope; Einstein-AEther gravity; Black holes

资金

  1. USTC, PR China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By studying Einstein-AEther gravity in light of EHT observations of M87*, we calculated photon effective potential, unstable photon sphere radius, and black hole shadow angular diameter, finding that Einstein-AEther black hole solutions agree with the shadow size of EHT M87* when AEther parameters are restricted within specific ranges.
We investigate Einstein-AEther gravity in light of the recent Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) observations of the M87*. The shape and size of the observed black hole shadow contains information of the geometry in its vicinity, and thus one can consider it as a potential probe to investigate different gravitational theories, since the involved calculation framework is enriched with different size-rotation features as well as with extra model parameters. In the case of Einstein-AEther gravity the black hole solutions include two classes depending on the involved aether parameters. We calculate the corresponding photon effective potential, the unstable photon sphere radius, and finally the induced angular size, which combined with the mass and the distance can lead to a single prediction that quantifies the black hole shadow, namely the diameter per unit mass d. Since d(M87*) is observationally known from the EHT Probe, we extract the corresponding parameter regions in order to obtain consistency. We find that Einstein-AEther black hole solutions agree with the shadow size of EHT M87*, if the involved AEther parameters are restricted within specific ranges, along with an upper bound on the dimensionless spin parameter a, which is verified by a full scan of the parameter space within 1 sigma-error. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据