4.6 Article

Influence of conservation tillage on Greenhouse gas fluxes and crop productivity in spring-wheat agroecosystems on the Loess Plateau of China

期刊

PEERJ
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11064

关键词

Crop productivity; Global warming potential; Methane; Nitrous oxide; Climate-smart; agriculture; Carbon-dioxide; Sustainability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31560378, 31560343]
  2. Gansu Key Research and Development Program [20YF8NA135]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examined the effects of Conservation Agriculture (CA) practices of no-till and straw mulch on crop productivity and greenhouse gas emissions in agroecosystems on the Northwestern Loess Plateau of China. Results showed that CA practices significantly improved soil water content, soil organic carbon, soil total nitrogen, and grain yield, while reducing soil temperature. Net CO2 emissions were reduced under CA practices compared to conventional tillage, and CA practices served as sinks of CH4 but did not reduce emissions of N2O, leading to a significant reduction in net Global warming potential (GWP). Soil hydrothermal and nutrient changes controlled crop yield and GHG responses to CA, indicating that adopting sustainable soil moisture improvement practices can enhance crop resilience to climate change and reduce GHG emissions in arid and semi-arid regions.
The effects of climate change such as dry spells, floods and erosion heavily impact agriculture especially smallholder systems on the Northwestern Loess Plateau of China. Nonetheless agriculture also contributes to global warming through the emission of greenhouse gases such as CO2, CH4 and N2O. Yet this complex conundrum can be alleviated and mitigated through sound soil and water management practices. Despite considerable literature on Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a strategy to improve the resilience and mitigation capacity of agroecosystems, there is still paucity of information on the impacts of CA on crop production and environmental quality on the Plateau. In order to fill this gap this study examined the effects of no-till and straw mulch on crop productivity and greenhouse gas fluxes in agroecosystems on the Plateau where farmers' common practice of conventional tillage (CT) was tested against three CA practices: conventional tillage with straw mulch (CTS), no-till (NT) and no-till with straw mulch (NTS). The results indicated that all three CA practices (CTS, NTand NTS) markedly increased soil water content (SWC), soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil total nitrogen (STN) but reduced soil temperature (ST). Average grain yields were 854.46 +/- 76.51, 699.30 +/- 133.52 and 908.18 +/- 38.64 kg ha-1 respectively under CTS, NT and NTS indicating an increase by approximately 33%, 9% and 41% respectively compared with CT (644.61 +/- 76.98 kg ha(-1)). There were significant (p < 0 :05) reductions of Net CO2 emissions under NT (7.37 +/- 0.89 tCO2e ha(-1)y(-1)) and NTS (6.65 +/- 0.73 tCO2e ha(-1)y(-1)) compared with CTS (10.65 +/- 0.18 tCO2e ha(-1)y(-1)) and CT (11.14 +/- 0.58 tCO2e ha(-1)y(-1)). All the treatments served as sinks of CH4but NTS had the highest absorption capacity (0.27 +/- 0.024 tCO2e ha(-1)y(-1)) and increased absorption significantly (p< 0 :05) compared with CT (0.21 +/- 0.017 tCO2e ha(-1)y(-1)); however, CA did not reduce emissions of N2O. These had an influence on Global warming potential (GWP) as NT and NTS resulted in significant reduction in net GWP. Grain yield was significantly correlated positively with SOC and STN (p< 0 :05); ecosystem respiration was also significantly correlated withSWCand ST whileCH(4) flux was highly correlated with ST (p< 0:001). Crop yield and GHG responses to CA were controlled by soil hydrothermal and nutrient changes, thus improving these conditions through adoption of sustainable soil moisture improvement practices such as no-till, straw mulch, green manuring, contour ploughing and terracing can improve crop resilience to climate change and reduce GHG emissions in arid and semi-arid regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据