4.7 Article

Ab Initio Theory of Photoemission from Graphene

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11051212

关键词

graphene; angle-resolved photoemission; electron scattering; augmented plane waves

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [PID2019-105488GB-I00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angle-resolved photoemission from monolayer and bilayer graphene is studied based on an ab initio one-step theory, showing a strong enhancement of emission intensity around scattering resonances. The effect of photoelectron scattering by the underlying substrate on the polarization dependence of the photocurrent is discussed. Experimental observations of the emission intensity are well reproduced within the dipole approximation.
Angle-resolved photoemission from monolayer and bilayer graphene is studied based on an ab initio one-step theory. The outgoing photoelectron is represented by the time-reversed low energy electron diffraction (LEED) state Phi(LEED)*, which is calculated using a scattering theory formulated in terms of augmented plane waves. A strong enhancement of the emission intensity is found to occur around the scattering resonances. The effect of the photoelectron scattering by the underlying substrate on the polarization dependence of the photocurrent is discussed. The constant initial state spectra I(k(parallel to), (h) over bar omega) are compared to electron transmission spectra T(E) of graphene, and the spatial structure of the outgoing waves is analyzed. It turns out that the emission intensity variations do not correlate with the structure of the T(E) spectra and are caused by rather subtle interference effects. Earlier experimental observations of the photon energy and polarization dependence of the emission intensity I(k(parallel to), (h) over bar omega) are well reproduced within the dipole approximation, and the Kohn-Sham eigenstates are found to provide a quite reasonable description of the photoemission final states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据